Sign in to see your user information My eBay Expand My eBay Summary Recently Viewed BidsOffers Watchlist Purchase History Buy Again Selling Saved Searches Saved Sellers Messages Notification Expand Cart Loading.You May Also Like Slide currentpage of totalpages - You May Also Like Binoculars Monoculars Monoculars Other Telescope Parts Meade Telescopes Celestron Telescopes Telescope Mirrors Prisms Meade Telescope Parts and Access.
Accessibility, User Agreement, Privacy, Cookies, Do not sell my personal information and AdChoice Norton Secured - powered by Verisign. Usually, focal reducer or field flatteners arent compatible with MAKs, making it hard to correct the aberrations. In fact, most amateur astronomers might have owned a Cassegrain telescope at some point in their lives. However, the story doesnt end there, as the Cassegrain is further divided into two types - Maksutov(MAK) and Schmidt(SCT). Here, we will talk about the differences between these two and let you decide which one to choose to meet your needs. These telescopes are true planet hunters, which render them as a suitable option for astrophotography. You can attach any camera to this type of telescope, as they move the primary mirror to focus a celestial object. This is because astrophotography with prime focus is a smooth ride. Moreover, you can also add any kind of focal reducer to minimize the focal length to experience a wider field of view. Maksutov Cassegrain Maksutov Cassegrain telescopes work by using a combination of lenses and mirrors. This type of scope is known as a catadioptric or compound telescope. Due to its unique and innovative design, the MAK telescope can use large-diameter optics without compromising the tube lengths. The Maksutov Cassegrain consists of a spherical primary mirror, a secondary mirror spot, and a corrector lens. After light enters the optical system of a MAK telescope, it covers thrice the distance of the optical tube. The corrector plate installed in the Maksutov corrector plate is referred to as the meniscus corrector. With the help of this corrector lens, you can correct a coma that appears in all reflecting telescopes. This MAK corrector is relatively thicker than the one used in the SCT. This is the reason MAK telescopes are normally created with a small aperture. Pros of MAK The manufacturing cost of the aperture proves to be reasonable, especially when compared to other optical designs. It doesnt need regular collimation, as the optics are perfectly aligned when they leave the factory. It has a long focal ratio, yet it is an amazingly compact telescope. Instead of using a secondary mirror, MAK telescopes take advantage of a secondary spot of reflective coating. These serve well for high-resolution planetary and lunar observation or astrophotography. Cons of MAK The Maksutov corrector lens is heavier and large, which requires more time to cool down.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |